Skip to content

← All states

Data center water impact, MS

Mississippi data centers ranked by water impact

Each campus's composite Water Impact combines modeled municipal water intake, supply-risk, treatment-chemical opportunity, and receiving-utility strain. Water intake is a modeled estimate (design-adjusted from disclosed capacity), never a metered figure.

Campuses covered

15

Avg water impact

32.3

Showing

15

CampusCoolingWater intakeRiskOpportunityImpact
--not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
--not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
--not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
--not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
--not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
Amazon Web ServicesAmazon Web Services-not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
Amazon Web ServicesAmazon Web Services-not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
Amazon Web ServicesAmazon Web Services-not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
Amazon Web ServicesAmazon Web Services-not modeledlowwatchlist27.1low
AWS Canton Mega SiteAmazon Web Services · Madisonair cooled0.23 MGDlowtier327.7high
AWS Mississippi Data Center Campus (Madison County)Amazon Web Services · Madisonair coolednot modeledlowwatchlist44.6medium
AWS Mississippi Data Center (Hinds County/Clinton)Amazon Web Services · Hindsair coolednot modeledlowwatchlist33.1medium
AWS Mississippi Data Center (Warren County/Vicksburg)Amazon Web Services · Warrenair coolednot modeledlowtier339.4medium
AWS Mississippi Region (Madison County)Amazon Web Services · Madisonevaporativenot modeledmediumtier354.6medium
AWS Vicksburg CampusAmazon Web Services · Warrenair coolednot modeledlowtier341.2medium

Water intake is modeled (design-adjusted from disclosed IT capacity), not a metered withdrawal. Bands are coarse tiers; the composite Water Impact is a 0-100 confidence-weighted score.

Source: OpenStreetMap facility inventory + EPA/USGS water data via the Water Hawk intelligence layer.